|
 |
 |
|
Armor Protection: They measured 9,210 tons to the Gloire's 5,617 tons and had 30 or more heavy guns arranged in the conventional broadside manner; they could make 14 knots, as compared with the French ship's 13 knots. All three ships had 4.5-inch armor, which for the moment could give protection against the strongest smoothbore or rifled guns. Whereas the Gloire's armor belt covered the whole length of her hull, however, the British armor covered only the vulnerable 213-foot midships section, the rest of the hull being protected by internal compartments.
In 1872, even before she was completed, Italy was planning even bigger guns and thicker armor for her Duilio and Dandolo, which finally had 17.7-inch guns and 17-inch armor. The British Inflexible, designed to match them, had 16-inch guns and armor that reached an all-time thickness of 24 inches. The dimensions in inches thereafter declined somewhat, but a series of important technological developments led to even harder-hitting guns and tougher armor. Between the mid-1880's and mid-1890's smokeless powder, high-explosive shells, and steel armor plate created new conditions.
Other nations, however, began to turn armored cruisers by 1890. With their side am they often approached battleships in size, g power, and appearance and usually exceei them in speed. In the eternal compromise tween armor, armament, and speed, a few & knots were often secured at the expense of a i inches of armor protection. Such ships presen a real threat to Britain, with its widespri empire and trade. British strategy tradition; called for confining enemy capital ships in p The most serious threat lay in potential ene supercruisers fast enough to evade any ship tl could not defeat. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
